Showing posts with label Ryanair. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ryanair. Show all posts

Saturday, 30 September 2017

Fasten your seat belts and please leave the tables in an upright position

There I was the other night poking around Tesco when a Polish neighbour approached me. She is looking forward to going home to Poland in November and asked me if she should be worried.  She usually travels Ryanair and wonders will the flight be cancelled. Aer Lingus is significantly dearer and she couldn’t afford to fly home as often.  This is the conundrum facing many, mostly low paid workers, who rely on another group of low paid workers in Ryanair to get home.

She pointed out that it’d be too dear to fly in December even with Ryanair so November has become the new Christmas for herself and her daughter as they catch up with family and friends.  I suggested she check Easyjet’s website as they fly from Belfast.

Yesterday I saw a facebook post from a former pupil who works as cabin crew with Ryanair. He was waiting at a bus stop outside a airport terminal when a man approached him and verbally abused him because his wife’s dream holiday had been cancelled once Michael O’Leary pulled flights. It reminded of how counter staff at Anglo Irish Bank were abused by their customers as they closed accounts when the bank collapsed 9 years ago.  People often vent their anger at the wrong person.  It is wrong and sad. The workers in Ryanair are no more responsible for the mess than those who worked the counter at Anglo.

There is a flaw in the Ryanair model. It is predicated on reducing all costs in all circumstances. It maxes the return from the customer base and keeps cost below those of their competitors..  Aircraft, wages, landing fees, fuel, handling charges, agents all reduced to as low as possible. Eventually something has to give.  Michael O’Leary used to thank God for Irish funerals as mourners from Britain flying home had to pay top dollar.

I presume O’Leary is on his knees once more. His pilots are leaving, his aircraft are on the ground. Ryanair jets are flown twice as much as most other competitors. Unless they fly they lose money.  The cancelling of the flights and uncertainty of the customer base mean that the number of passengers will drop. It is not economic to run a plane that costs €98M and fill it with passengers paying just €9.99.  I’m not saying there is a bubble in the budget airline business but if the company needs to keep its pilots it can’t sustain these prices. Pilots can get better pay in Asia or the Middle East and they’re voting with their feet. There’s little that Michael O’Leary and his management team can do about that except pay their staff more.  We all know what that will mean for the price of a ticket.

At the back of it O'Leary reckons that if they increase pay for pilots cabin crew will be next in line. You know those videos you see sometimes of yobs giving stick to cabin crew before they take off? Well it seems the cabin crew are not actually paid to deal with the matter and that they don’t get paid until the plane takes off. Can you imagine a fire fighter at the airport being told, that you don’t get paid unless they’ve to deal with an incident? No. Me neither. Would I work under the conditions that Ryanair staff are expected to work for their pay? Absolutely not. 

So what has all this to do with Wexford? Well quite a lot actually. If Ryanair increase their costs then they must increase their average fare. If they do that they will make cheap travel less affordable. They will also be less competitive and they will become like one of those expensive airlines that Michael O’Leary got so much publicity by criticising. That will mean less flights although it will not necessarily mean that people will not want to travel. People will find other ways to get around, the market will move on.

Unlike Ryanair who sell planes when they get to 10 years old, Irish Rail’s rolling stock last longer, cost less to run and while it won’t  generate as much revenue on an average train journey as a Boeing 737-800 from Dublin to Stansted it is economically more sustainable.  Some of the passengers will revert to boat and train or bus, especially when it comes to travel from Ireland to Britain.  Dublin London is the second busiest air corridor in the world.  If even half a million passengers per year shifted to boat and train or bus from air lines, that’d fill an 8 coach train out of Holyhead or Fishguard every day. Dublin Airport by the way expects over 24 Million passengers in 2017, so these figures are not fanciful.  It will also generate substantial increases of foot passengers into Rosslare. Already 25,000 foot passengers use Fishguard.  The turbulence at Ryanair can have an upside for the shipping companies that operate into Rosslare.

As I’ve said before on this blog, Michael O’Leary must be down on his knees thanking God for Irish Rail management.  If it was raining soup, these guys would be out with a fork!  They are pushing ahead with their plans to terminate train services to Rosslare hoping that by amending the plan to terminate at Wexford rather than Gorey. The €4.4M question as to how much they can save on that proposal will be figured out by the NTA.


In the meantime, is my Polish neighbour going to get home before the end of the year? I wish I knew.   

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

We might be experiencing a little turbulence!



I grew up so near Dublin Airport that I always presumed  as a child that there was no difference between Aer Lingus and Dublin Airport.  Up the northside you cannot underestimate what Dublin Airport, Aer Lingus and Ryanair mean to the local economy.  Aviation nowadays is enormous.  25% of all aircraft operated around the world are either Irish operated, leased,  financed or registered.  We’ve come a long way since I was a kid.
So when Fianna Fail privatised a majority stake holding in Aer Lingus 9 years ago there was concern at what that might eventually mean.  The purchase by Ryanair of a large stake of the company with a view to a proposed merger raised concerns about a monopoly.  Now there is a final proposal from IAG the owners of British Airways to buy Aer Lingus.
My concern at how the debate has gone seems to focus on Heathrow and access to Ireland from London.  Isn’t there something 1980’s about all that?  Sure London is very important and there needs to be access to international flights, there is real concern that jobs will go as the larger group will provide synergies, the sale of the last public influence in Aer Lingus will expose the former state airline to full blooded hard nosed business.  The strings will be cut and the notion of the Department of transport being the downtown office of Aer Lingus will be consigned to history. Due to EU rules it is sink or swim in aviation.  Just look at how Cyprus Air folded a few weeks ago, leaving another island without control over its own access.
There are other issues that don’t seem to register.  Firstly Dublin Airport is itself developing into a hub as passengers from the UK take transatlantic flights. 25% of Aer Lingus transatlantic passengers originate elsewhere in Europe and join a flight here.  The stands at Dublin Airport for wide body aircraft are at 100% usage as it is, even with the new Terminal 2.  I don’t know where the room that IAG claim they have to expand Aer Lingus long haul services out of Dublin may be.  An A 380 which is the long haul aircraft of the future will need a longer runway than what Dublin has at present to take off fully loaded to travel long haul.
 I also think that IAG will get more out of the deal than the present shareholders.  Aer Lingus happens to have about €400M in cash, the total sale of government shares would only realise about €320M for the state.  IAG propose to give the state cash up front, but what else is there in this for the government? 
Dublin Airport on the other hand carries 75% of all airline passengers from Ireland.  What is the attraction for Irish passengers to Heathrow as a hub?  If you’re travelling to Australia it is faster to travel by Ethiad or Emirates to make just one stop rather than two travelling by Heathrow.  There are 15 destinations from Dublin in North America. Again it’s faster to connect there.  There are 2 separate issues; what is in the interest of Aer Lingus to ensure it has a role into the future and secondly how do you get more planes landing in Ireland?  There’s more to Irish aviation than just Dublin Airport. 
Dublin and Shannon have one plus and that is immigration clearance for the US.  There is enormous to potential to develop westwards across the Atlantic.  Heathrow is simply in the wrong place for that.  What is in the strategic interest of Aer Lingus is the need to work with a Middle Eastern or North American airline. 
What is important is that we have daily connections to San Francisco so as to develop industrial policy with the IT industry.  What is important is that air transport facilitates the development of the country.  What seems to me is that IAG are thinking IAG first and Ireland second. That's why they want the entire shareholding, pitching cleverly at a price that might attract Ryanair to sell and under stock exchange rules taking the company private but within IAG.  For me it’s not good enough to sell what Fianna Fail left behind on the shelf.   I’d hold on to the states shares.