There are few areas of life more subjective than politics.
Everyone has an opinion, everyone can tell you what they think might
happen. The intensity of the moment
means that when an issue slides out of the headlines and onto the backburner, More
than 3 years on from the decision to abolish the local borough council, perhaps
it’s timely to look back at what Phil Hogan axed.
Minister Hogan sexed up his abolition with a forecast that
abolishing councils would save €420M in the four years up to 2017. Phil Hogan got his way and then got his free
pass to the EU Commission. However there was little money saved by
cutting the number of councils. Quietly the pay bill has climbed.
What we got was towns run by rurally elected
Councillors. In Wexford just 3 councillors now live in the town as opposed to 12 previously on the
Borough Council. To compensate the towns for the loss of their council
additional seats were allocated to districts. In most cases these seats went to
rural based candidates in 2014. What happened in Wexford was reflected many
times around the country. Town voters didn’t see the need to vote for town
based candidates. Simple as.
But while the focus is now on undoing the decision to
abolish town councils, it’s time to move the debate on. Two things need to be
done; a decision on what population is required to support a town council and
what powers are to be given to these restored bodies.
It’s unlikely that restored councils will have the same
number of seats as previous. If that were to happen, then County Council’s
could possibly lose some of the extra seats allocated in 2014. That might not
be a bad thing as 31 councillors in Wexford all wanting to contribute on an
issue makes for a time consuming and slow decision making.
The term Mayor should only be used in relation to a town
council. People visualise a city or large town when they hear the word Mayor. Often
people assume that the Mayor is an ambassador for a town. That’s only true to
an extent. Mayor’s used to have real powers. All Mayors are ex oficio members
of all committees and sub-committees in the council.
When I served as Mayor it coincided with a campaign by the
council to encourage tenants to buy out their ground rent from the councils. I
must have signed off on hundreds of applications that year. The Mayor had to
verify tenders and CPO’s. The Mayor is required to give legal effect to many of
the councillor’s decisions. But the Mayor is also the ultimate ombudsman with
the council officials. Councillors would often contact the Mayor to ask for
something specific to be done. I don’t know if our present Mayor has those
powers any more. Wexford Borough District
Council doesn’t have its own cheque book. The housing committee where all
councillors could discuss issues regarding housing in the town disappeared at a
time when one was more needed than ever.
We hear a lot about the council isn’t working but we hear
little of what the solution may be. Perhaps the problem lies in the fact that
the 2014 local election was seen as referendum on the government. Voter turnout
was greater in rural areas than in urban areas as it generally is. That
disadvantaged urban candidates at a stroke. Some successful candidates
campaigned on national issues that they had little chance of influencing. The
County Council was supposed to deal with policy issues only meeting as little
as 3 or 4 time a year. The real business
was supposed to be done at district level. That never happened. Instead we had councillors who saw the council
as the next step on the way to the Dail use the council to deliver national
messages.
So urban issues dropped further off the agenda. It used to be the case that it was easy to contact a councillor, you'd see them on the street. Now? There's a lot less of them with more work to keep them going.
So what can be done? Restore the urban
councils, give its members a say with a housing, justice and enterprise
committee. The sooner this happens the better. There is increasing alienation
in Wexford Town among citizens from their council. Most people couldn’t name
the Mayor and apart from George Lawlor, few people are aware of who to go to
when things are tough.
And that was not what was supposed to happen according to
Phil Hogan. Better decision making placing the interest of the town at the
heart of the district was supposed to be what would result. We don’t need
another run at a failed system at our next local elections. Time to go back to
what works.
No comments:
Post a Comment